Top Stories
PRAKASH RIMAL
KATHMANDU: Although monarchy was abolished following the Constituent Assembly election in April 2008, the Spring 2006 Movement had effectively put the 240-year old dynasty to an end, setting the stage for the emergence new political equations. The Maoists, who had waged a decade-long armed conflict exploiting the inherent weaknesses that existed in the Nepali society, were well on the road to become a strong political force in the country. The Madhesh — also known as the Terai, Nepal’s bread basket and a vote bank of Nepali Congress — was heating up in search of an identity that it had long been craving for, coupled with heightened sense of ethnicity awareness among the Janajati, Tharu, Dalits, women and Muslims.
The aspirations for change, however, were thwarted by inter and intra-party conflicts, rampant corruption — sadly, a hallmark of Nepali politics and governance system — and deteriorating economic conditions of the people. These are some issues Professor Baral’s latest book — Nepal-Nation-state in the Wilderness — deals with.
The book comes comprises six chapters — the last, being What Next? Here, the author concludes: The agenda of making a new Nepal has suffered due to political leaders’ lack of commitment, vision, and determination. As a result, he argues, the replacement of regime — from monarchy to republic — is not felt by the general people. “Old feudal — authoritarian values continue with the new elites becoming irrelevant to governance,” he states. A veteran academic and an authority on politics in his own right, Prof Baral does also recommend some measures to correct the ills: revamping and restructuring the state; setting common agenda and ending disparity gap; evolving consensus on foreign and security policies; understanding nationalism; and improving on the governance and service delivery.
He concludes the book on a rather pessimistic note and the political leadership had better get the point: Paradoxically, the state has not reached the terminal point; neither has it given us any promising picture for the future. Democracy is in peril, so is the vitality of the state.
From the book jacket itself
Nepal-Nation-state in Wilderness takes a critical look at three important aspects of modern Nepal: viability of the Nepali State, prospects and challenges of its liberal democracy, and strategies for managing the emerging geopolitical trends.
The author analyses the transformation of Maoists into a systematic party within the liberal-democratic setup and the mutual distrust that developed afterward. The book further explores the state of Nepal’s physical location between China and India and Nepal’s own incapacity to manage the geopolitical pulls and pressures arising out of its unique position. The book is an insight into the tenets of liberal democracy, its applicability to the scenario in Nepal, and the historical developments that determine how democracy takes shape.
Posted on: 2012-06-10 06:26:49
Dear Nepalese Readers and Nationalists ! Of course, the constitutional monarchy is itself reinstated since 27 May 2012 when the Constituent Assembly expired. The reality is that the term of the Constituent Assembly ended at midnight of 27 May 2012, with failure to promulgate a constitution. This ended the relevance of Prime Minister Baburam Bhattarai’s cabinet, the presidential apparatus and all elements formed under the interim constitution of 2006. The President and Prime Minister, without constitutional mandate, are legally debarred from exercising any constitutional right. Despite this, the so-called President Ram Baran Yadav designated Baburam Bhattarai as the acting prime minister. How can Ram Baran Yadav who has lost his own position direct Bhattarai to continue in office as acting PM? Baburam Bhattarai is automatically relieved of his position as prime minister and member of the Constituent Assembly with the dissolution of the latter. Despite losing his constitutional status, Bhattarai has announced dates for re-election of a new Constituent Assembly in November 2012, something for which there is no legal provision, and which requires the consent of all political parties (two-third majority of the CA was necessary before the expiry of its term). The Constituent Assembly failed to promulgate the constitution within the stipulated time span of two years. Its term was repeatedly extended and the work of drafting the new constitution could still not be completed in four years time, climaxing with the dissolution of the Constituent Assembly. With their failure to draft a new constitution, party leaders betrayed the nation and the people. The interim constitution 2006 that was introduced for the management of the Constituent Assembly has no meaning after the dissolution of the latter. The interim constitution 2006 stands automatically dissolved as the new constitution was not drafted in time. This means that the 1990 constitution with constitutional monarchy stands automatically revived.So, please, we should follow the fact and the actual solution to end the Nepalese crisis. Thank you. Dirgha Raj Prasai Kathmandu. Dirgha Raj Prasai, Kathmandu, Nepal