Top Stories
HIMALAYAN NEWS SERVICE
KATHMANDU: Chairman of the Madhesi Janadhikar Forum, Nepal, Upendra Yadav today said fresh mandate was the only viable option to bail the country out of current political, constitutional and economic crisis.
Addressing a programme organised by his party’s youth wing on ‘Nepal’s current political situation’, Yadav criticised both the opposition and the ruling parties saying the former was trying to secure the chair of the Prime Minister, while the latter was trying to prolong its rule.
He went on to say, “Major leaders of the big three parties deliberately failed the Constituent Assembly to abort the issues of federalism and inclusion and the United Democratic Mahadhesi Front leaders became a party to their conspiracy.”
Similarly, the Sadbhawana Party Co-Chair Laxmanlal Karna said Madhesis could attain their rights only through movement and if consensus was not formed soon, the UDMF should leave the current government and go to the people of Madhes. “We are ready to go to the people of Madhes irrespective of what other UDMF partners do,” he added.
It’s the Nepali Congress and UML that are mainly hindering federalism and inclusion, Karna said.
“Sharad Singh Bhandari merely reflected marginalisation of Madhesis but who demanded his resignation, who stalled the house?” Karna asked in a veiled reference to the NC and the UML’s campaign against Bhandari in the face of latter’s purported secessionist remarks.
Coordinator of the CPN (Maoist) Matrika Prasad Yadav said none of the Pahadi leaders, whether they were from the UCPN-M or the other outfits, wanted to empower Madhesi and other marginalised communities. He accused the government of misusing public funds.
Vice-chair of the Terai Madhes Democratic Party Brikhesh Chandra Lal labelled the NC and the UML as anti-federalists forces and said they talked of 6-8 pradeshes, 9-pradesh and 11-pradesh model just to abort federalism.
“How could the Congress which has just now formed a panel under Bhim Bahadur Tamang, to form its view on federalism, can claim it as a federalist force?” he questioned.
On his part Devendra Poudel, political advisor to the Prime Minister, said his party was committed to secure identity-based federalism because that alone could recognise the identity of the excluded groups and empower them. He criticised the NC and the UML ‘for running away from elections.’
Poudel urged the opposition parties not to incite the President or else the executive powers supposed to remain with the real executive body might not remain with the same body.
NC leader Ramesh Lekhak said his party was not anti-federalist force and was committed to identity based federalism. “Our major concern is that federalism should not disturb social harmony,” he added.
CPN-UML General Secretary Ishwar Pokhrel said they were committed to carve out states on the basis of identity and economic capability but country’s geopolitical situation should be kept in mind.
He said the current political problems could be resolved only through political consensus and not merely through amendments to laws and constitution.
Posted on: 2012-08-22 06:49:58
Chairman of the Madhesi Janadhikar Forum, Nepal, Upendra Yadav and his members of his party including all the Medhesi party leaders have no knowledge about the solution of Nepal's politics. They are fighting only their benefits for money and power. Now, the regime is moving without constitution. The Interim constitution also is already dead when Constituent Assembly expired. The term of the Constituent Assembly ended at midnight of 27 May 2012, with failure to promulgate a constitution. This ended the relevance of Prime Minister Baburam Bhattarai’s cabinet, the presidential apparatus and all elements formed under the interim constitution of 2006. The President and Prime Minister, without constitutional mandate, are legally debarred from exercising any constitutional right. The Constituent Assembly failed to promulgate the constitution within the stipulated time span of two years. Its term was repeatedly extended and the work of drafting the new constitution could still not be completed in four years time, climaxing with the dissolution of the Constituent Assembly. With their failure to draft a new constitution, party leaders betrayed the nation and the people. The interim constitution 2006 that was introduced for the management of the Constituent Assembly has no meaning after the dissolution of the latter. The interim constitution 2006 stands automatically dissolved as the new constitution was not drafted in time. This means that the 1990 constitution with constitutional monarchy stands automatically revived. Nepal Students’ Union founder-coordinator, Nepali Congress leader and veteran advocate Devendra Nepali wrote in a daily newspaper, “If the interim constitution 2006 fails to draft a new constitution then it will automatically dissolve and become defunct. The existence of the political parties was accepted as per the 1990 constitution; in this sense the 1990 constitution is seen as the legal parent of the political parties. It was established by the 1990 constitution viewing the people as sovereign. The dissolution of the interim constitution will automatically revive and activate the constitutional monarchy, multiparty parliamentary system and all other organs and institutions under 1990 constitution. It is fallacious to posit a nation without a constitution when the legality of the 1990 constitution revives.” Maoist leader C.P. Gajurel opined, “'Baburam Bhattarai is not a member of the CA, so he cannot continue as PM.” Then why the Madhesi groups are suggesting for new election? First of all, there should implement the 1990 constitution, then election and everything we can move with consciously. Thank you. Dirgha Raj Prasai Political Analyst. Dirgha Raj Prasai, kathmandu, Nepal