Samsung moves US Supreme Court to challenge Apple patent ‘windfall’ ruling
NEW YORK: Samsung took to the US Supreme Court on Monday in a last-ditch effort to pare back the more than $548 million in damages it must pay Apple for infringing the patents and designs of the iPhone.
Samsung’s petition must first be accepted for review by Supreme Court. It is the latest step in a long-running patent lawsuit between the rival firms that epitomised global smartphone wars.
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd paid Apple Inc $548.2 million on Monday, fulfilling part of its liability stemming from a 2012 verdict for infringing Apple’s patents and copying the iPhone’s look.
In its petition to the high court, Samsung said it should not have had to make as much as $399 million of that payout for copying the patented designs of iPhone’s rounded-corner front face, bezel, and gridded icons. It said that awarding total profits from sale of its devices with those designs, even if they relate only to a small portion of the phone, allows for ‘unjustified windfalls’ far beyond the inventive value of the patents.
“A patented design might be the essential feature of a spoon or rug. But the same is not true of smartphones, which contain countless other features that give them remarkable functionality wholly unrelated to their design,” Samsung told the high court.
Apple did not address the new petition, but said in a statement, “We make these products to delight our customers, not for our competitors to flagrantly copy.”
Samsung’s quest to limit damages to Apple comes after the US Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit in Washington, DC in May stripped about $382 million from $930 million Samsung owed following the 2012 verdict. The appeals court said the iPhone’s appearance could not be protected through trademarks.