Soft power works. So do democratic elections. And it is possible to de-escalate longstanding violence and hate. These are the lessons of that forgotten corner of the world, Serbia-Kosovo. In this case, soft power is the allure of the European Union (EU). It makes other countries in the region want to join the EU club of peace and prosperity — even at the cost of making painful democratic reforms and ending feuds with neighbours.

The key election here for Serbia came last May, when for the first time in five years the Serbs’ desire to join the EU won priority over ultranationalist resentment at the impending “loss” of Kosovo, Serbia’s 90 per cent Albanian province. A much disputed declaration of conditional independence — under EU supervision — finally took place just

before the Serbian election. The electoral campaign featured the prospect of violence, including the threat to murder moderate Serbian President Boris Tadic, just as reforming Prime Minister Zoran Djindjic was murdered in 2003.

After the election, Tadic was able to bring together a pro-European government that within days arrested war-crimes fugitive Radovan Karadzic, the political leader of the Bosnian Serbs during the 1995 Srebrenica massacre of 8,000 unarmed Muslims. And the stunning aftermath was the no-show rate at the hard-liner street protests against the arrest.

The organisers expected 300,000 to answer their call; only 10,000 turned out. Subsequently, the ultranationalist Radical Party, which for five years had set the political agenda, sealed its impotence by splitting in two. Belgrade’s new government, while still insisting that Kosovo’s independence is illegal, has detoxified this issue and is now acting pragmatically rather than ideologically.

It has renounced the use of force. It has moved the dispute from the hot political to the cool legal arena by appealing it to the International Court of Justice. It is giving top priority to finishing Djindjic’s initial legal and institutional reforms in order to qualify for EU membership.

For nine months last year, Belgrade refused to let the EU deploy its supervisory rule-of-law mission in northern Kosovo. But in December, after some UN diplomatic fudging, the new Serbian government agreed to the deployment and signalled that it would do its part to provide a permissive rather than hostile environment in north Kosovo.

That is when tacit cooperation between Belgrade and the EU in Kosovo became concrete. If past patterns had been repeated, both Serb and Albanian hard-liners — and the mafias that smuggle through Kosovo the bulk of the heroin that reaches EU territory — would have exploded the patient peacemaking of Serb and Albanian moderates. They would have orchestrated “ethnic” mob clashes that would have quickly started a fresh cycle of revenge and retaliation.

This time around, though, that dog didn’t bark. Moreover, for the first time media in Serbia and Kosovo did not treat the disturbances as ethnic clashes, but instead asked pointedly which mafias were instigating them and why.

And why isn’t this success story more widely known? Precisely because of its success. It has not produced the bloodshed that wins headlines. Kosovo’s obscurity in the rest of the world is a very good sign indeed. — The Christian Science Monitor