Falling out of love with Sarkozy

Who is Nicolas Sarkozy? What is his political project for France? Is he a Gallic Thatcherite, a closet neocon? Or is he economically dirigiste, a kind of socialist in disguise? These conflicting interpretations are all erroneous. “Sarkozyism” combines the Orleanist and Bonapartist traditions of the French right (the economic liberalism of a Giscard d’Estaing and the

populism and authoritarianism of a De Gaulle), peppered with a broad range of ideological references. In his speeches, Sarkozy cherry-picks quotations from leftwing figures (Jaures, Blum) and far-right thinkers (Barres).

Such absurd posturing is at best comical, at worst worrying. Sarkozy may also be seen as a “Berlusconian buffoon” — eager to entertain, bully and manipulate the media. When the

political news is bad for the president, “Sarko the showman” enters the fray to divert attention. On Tuesday, he appeared before journalists in Paris to trumpet his achievement in “breaking with a hateful tradition of hypocrisy” by making public his relationship with former model Carla Bruni. His taste for flashy watches and sunglasses, and his fascination for the jet-set, have earned him the dubious nickname of President Bling Bling.

But the bling and gossip disguise a growing malaise. Seven months into his presidency, a majority of French voters are hungover. Newspaper surveys show Sarkozy’s approval rates slipping. His first actions have been utterly disappointing for the less affluent. According to a recent poll, only one in four of the public believes that Sarkozy will improve their economic situation.

On the one hand, he has refused to raise the minimum wage on the grounds that there is no money to do so (while giving himself a salary rise of 170%), decreased health subsidies, and introduced TV licence fees for the poorest households. On the other, he has scrapped inheritance tax and reduced taxation on the highest incomes.

His campaign slogan “work more to earn more” has turned out to be a sham. Before May 2007, it was possible to work more than the legal 35-hour week. Sarkozy has not “freed work”, for such a right already existed. He has decided that all working hours beyond the 35-hour limit will no longer be paid at a higher rate. This means salaried workers will, in effect, work more to earn less.

The French president has also managed to neutralise his main political opponents. The philosopher Alain Badiou has labelled Sarkozy’s politics “transcendental Petainism”. This is not to say Sarkozy is a fascist. The comparison helps underline that, like the chief of the Vichy regime, Sarkozy talks of “regeneration” and “rupture”, whereas he is the architect of France’s capitulation. In Petain’s case, it was capitulation to the Germans; for Sarkozy, it is capitulation to global capitalism and US hegemony.

Like Petain, Sarkozy talks obsessively of “moral crisis” and “decline” — notions conveniently chosen to justify the “inevitability” of (neoliberal) reforms.

Petain thought France should imitate Nazi Germany. Sarkozy wants to emulate the US and UK economic “models”. From an ideological stand, “Sarkozyism” comes across as an incoherent bricolage. From a socio-economic point of view, it is consistently devoted to implementing the economic agenda of global capitalism. — The Guardian