TOPICS : Now they are in Bangladesh too

While the CIA and the Pentagon search in vain for Osama bin Laden in the mountains of Pakistan, an Al Qaeda affiliate has been quietly building up terrorist bases in the jungles of Bangladesh under the protective aegis of a new military regime in Dhaka allied with Islamist forces. The founding leader of the Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami in Bangladesh, Fazlur Rehman Khalil, was one of the six signatories of bin Laden’s first declaration of holy war against the United States, and a US State Department study reports that Harkat “maintains contact with Al Qaeda in Afghanistan.”

Bush administration officials privately endorse mounting Indian evidence that Bangladeshi Harkat agents spearheaded a series of terrorist attacks in India. But the US has conspicuously failed to press Bangladesh’s military ruler, Gen. Moeen U Ahmed, for a crackdown on Harkat and for the removal of highly placed intelligence officials with Islamist ties. General Ahmed staged a bloodless coup in January 2007, forcing a figurehead president to give him emergency powers. He has pledged to hold elections in December and return power to a civilian government. The Bush administration, while formally urging him to hold the elections on schedule, has so far ignored his efforts to rig them.

Ahmed is maneuvering to break up the two biggest secular political parties, the Awami League, which actively opposes Islamist influence, and the Bangladesh National Party. He barred political activity by their popular leaders. Invoking his emergency powers, he is rounding up grass-roots leaders of the two parties and muzzling the media.

Harkat, Jamaat-i-Islami Bangladesh and other Islamist groups that support the military regime are operating unhindered. By its silence in the face of Ahmed’s power grab, Washington is signaling that it sees little hope of ending military rule. But it is much too soon to write off the prospects for democracy in Bangladesh, where almost everyone was politicised during the independence struggle. Since then, three free elections have been held, and two previous military regimes have proved to be short-lived.

When Bangladeshi journalists attempted to write about Islamist sympathisers in the military regime and their links with Islamabad, they have faced assassination attempts. The army contends that past civilian regimes were hopelessly corrupt and practiced only a “feudal democracy”. The military takeover in 2007 was unavoidable, it says, because the last civilian government, was rigging forthcoming elections.

But the Bangladesh Constitution requires elections within 90 days of the dissolution of Parliament. The army regime has been unconstitutional since April 2007.

The United States and other aid donors should use their powerful leverage to push hard for an immediate end to emergency powers and for general elections by December. It would be a bitter irony if a new Musharraf should emerge in Dhaka just as Pervez Musharraf finds himself increasingly embattled in Islamabad. —The Christian Science Monitor