IN OTHER WORDS: Gun control

By now, the logic is almost automatic. A shooter takes innocent lives, and someone says that if the victims had been armed, this wouldn’t have happened. The only solution to a gun in the wrong hands, it seems, is a gun in the hands of everyone. That’s the state of the debate over gun control today. The US National Rifle Association and the gun lobby have silenced every legislature. Instead of stricter laws, tighter controls and better background checks, the gun lobby proposes more guns.

The laws are as fragile and imperfect as they are because that is how the gun lobby wants them — and it is paying good money to keep them that way. Those gun advocates who believe that the Second Amendment confers the right to carry a gun in public are quick to point out that they are law-abiding, decent citizens trying to protect themselves and their families in a world gone mad. But the guns can’t tell the difference. Arming more people would be a recipe for disaster.

True safety lies in the civility of society, in laws that publicly protect all of our rights and in having law-enforcement officers who are trained in the use of deadly force, then authorised to apply it in rationally defined situations. It is the gun lobby’s incessant efforts to weaken the gun laws that makes a tragedy like the one at Virginia Tech possible.