Incorrect observation

I completely disagree with the editorial “Back door entry” (THT, Feb. 9). The Nepal Agricultural Research Council (NARC) is severely understaffed, which has reduced its capacity much. All the high-profile NARC officials and scientists have gone abroad in search of greener pastures. This is not surprising as the government has turned a deaf ear to their needs

for long.

Moreover, I cannot understand why you have alleged nepotism and cronyism in NARC when a selection committee of top agricultural scientists chooses new employees through fair exams. Finally, the country needs to give high priority to agriculture as over 70 per cent of the population depend on it for their livelihood.

Kundan Dhakal, Kathmandu

Failed theory

I cannot understand why so many people are supporting the Maoists. Firstly, the economic model they propose is based on a theory that has failed in the world. Even China was a poor country when it was under Mao Zedong. Only after Deng Xiaoping brought in sweeping reforms in the economy did China begin to prosper.

Furthermore, the Maoists’ records of brutality, human rights abuses and manipulation of the most vulnerable groups raise questions about their intent.

Bikash Ojha, Nuwakot

Hypocrisy

The Maoists staged protests rallies in Pokhara on February 7 demanding legal action against Brigadier General Dilip SJB Rana for making politically motivated statements. The same day, one of their sister organisations threatened to kill Supreme Court advocate Jyoti Bania. The Maoists have made such threats against others time and again in violation of the peace accord.

Maoist central member C P Gajurel recently spoke of an urban rebellion at a programme organised by the students of Jawaharlal Nehru University. If the Maoists make such

irresponsible statements, why cannot they tolerate similar statements of other people?

Neeraj Roy, via e-mail

Use Nepali

Nepal is a diverse country of many castes, creeds, and languages. But we should not forget that 48.61 per cent of the Nepalis can speak Nepali, with Maithili coming in a distant second at 12.30 per cent.

I assume that every member of Parliament can speak and understand Nepali, so why use

languages that only a few understand? What good will it serve? I urge all the MPs to use Nepali during parliamentary sessions.

Language should be convenient to all or at least to the majority of the people.

Saurav Sharma, via e-mail

Public show

Valentine’s Day is at hand. I have noticed of late that more people are showing their love in public. But our youngsters should not forget that in our society the elders deserve great respect, so it is better for us to keep our emotions private.

Public display of love between two sexes is not only undesirable but offensive as well. People should not commercialise love in the name of Valentine’s Day. True love lies at heart and unnecessary public display will only cheapen love.

Sashi Subba, via e-mail