Teargas, running battles with the police and an overnight occupation of the Sorbonne. French students last week reminded us once again that nobody does protest with the elan of the French. It’s a tradition, but the curious paradox of these riots is that they are mounted to preserve the status quo.

French students claim they are fighting for every under-26-year-old in France; for equality and solidarity; for an idea of the left, France and Europe. Put like that, it is intoxicating stuff. They are resisting a measure which the government and the international consensus say will tackle France’s No 1 social problem: that more than one in five French young people is out of work.

The proposition is that to help the young into employment, they have to be easier to sack. If you want employers to hire young people whose skills and aptitude to do the job are an unknown quantity, says the centre-right government of Prime Minister Dominique Villepin, then it has to be made easier for employers to fire them if they prove incompetent. It proposes that the country’s under-26s should, for two years after employment, be sackable with no compensation and no reasons given. As a result, it predicts, youth unemployment would fall by more than 20 per cent. The students do not believe him. The planned Contrat Premiere Embauche (contract of first employment) has become totemic of everything France hates. It treats workers unequally, creates systemic insecurity and is the kind of policy embraced by the European Commission in Brussels and ‘les Anglo-Saxons’. In a different context, it might work as the government predicts and be politically acceptable, but in today’s context, it is condemned to fail. Withdrawing rights from people when unemployment is already high is close to impossible. It can only be done when times are good, demand is rising and unemployment is falling.

I have thought for some time that the French should create a British approach to mortgage borrowing and house prices to fuel some rise in demand, but that, too, is seen as far too Anglo-Saxon, liberal and individualistic. We are witnessing a cultural tragedy unfold. The French carry a Utopian ideal in their collective heads. They are self-appointed defenders of Europe’s real republican virtues of liberty, equality and fraternity. Their rightful place is as Europe’s leaders, and the state, embodying an idea of France, is the nation’s master puppeteer.

None of this works in 2006. The state, as all others in Europe, is circumscribed by global market forc-es. France is only one of 25 EU member states and the way liberty, equality and fraternity have been delivered since the 1950s has to be recast. French students find themselves in the same ambiguous position as their country.

Their only solution to the challenge of modernity is to defend the status quo to the last, even if it is evident it is malfunctioning. But the government is behaving inter-governmentally just as the students are, aggressively trying to preserve an indefensible status quo to maintain a utopian idea of France. — The Guardian