From the Mediterranean to the Indian Ocean, the armed forces of the states located in the worldâ€™s most intense conflict zone are stacked together like a dangerous house of cards. They plan, plot and puzzle, as embattled military establishments always do. Yet the most important decisions are arguably those that face the army least often mentioned in discussion â€” that of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
For the Pakistani army has to decide how to save itself and the country it has dominated for so long. In the struggle across the region, it could even be said that decisions made in Rawalpindi, the armyâ€™s headquarters, may turn out to be more important than those made in Washington, Baghdad, Tehran or Tel Aviv. And this army is highly autonomous. It has frequently been the government, and remains by far the most powerful institution in the country.
The regional war on whose name nobody can agree â€” terror, occupation, invasion â€” has shifted its shape in recent years. In western eyes, anyway, it was in the beginning about Afghanistan, then Iraq was its epicentre, until the focus shifted to Iran and its nuclear ambitions, and then back to Afghanistan. Pakistan always figured when Afghanistan was in the spotlight because failure to deal effectively with the Taliban and Al Qaeda in the border areas puts North Atlantic Treaty Oraganisation (NATO) forces at a disadvantage.
The Pakistani army, however, is still following a strategy of negotiations and ceasefires, punctuated by well-signalled and often bloodless sweeps by the local Frontier Corps. True, this is also the policy of the new national government and of the Peshawar provincial government.
It is also true that heavy-handed military operations are not the best counter to insurgency. But in the armyâ€™s case, the softly, softly approach has been shaped by the defeats and setbacks it suffered in earlier efforts to deal with insurgents and by its own involvement in backing extremist movements. Such movements were useful tools in the confrontation with India in Kashmir, and in influencing events in Afghanistan.
It is less a question of the armyâ€™s tactical choices than of whether it still cannot give up the idea of â€œkeepingâ€ the militant movements as a card in future conflicts. But the militants are out of control. They tried to kill president Parvez Musharraf, they probably killed Benazir Bhutto, they have bombed army offices and even the headquarters of Inter-Services Intelligence.
The attempt to outwit India, the rationale of the Pakistani armed forces since independence, is outdated. As Ahmed Rashid says in his book on the regional crisis, Descent into Chaos: â€œThe armyâ€™s insecurity... has now come full circle, for Pakistanâ€™s very future is at stake as extremists threaten to undermine Pakistan itself.â€
That threat comes at a time when Pakistan is otherwise in a process of renewal, as evidenced by the success of liberal and secular candidates in recent elections. An expanding urban middle class wants a new kind of country, and feudal and tribal dominance in rural areas is fading.
Overprivileged and muddle-headed, the army needs to follow suit. If it does so, the moment of opportunity for extremism in Pakistan will be brief â€” and that could have a transforming effect on the rest of the
region. â€” The Guardian