Work in the home has traditionally been unpaid, not considered an economically valuable job. Because the home has not generally been considered a 'workplace', many countries still do not include domestic work as formal employment, meaning domestic work is not yet recognised as work within labour law
When I took up my role as the regional director of the International Labour Organisation (ILO) in Bangkok, domestic workers were at the forefront of my mind. Not only is the Asia Pacific region home to half of the world's domestic workers, but this group of workers exists at the nexus of so many areas of my own personal interest –the rights of women workers, health and housing, international cooperation and migration governance.
For so many of us, it is impossible to think about the issue of domestic work without emotion.
Many of those reading this will have had close relationships with domestic workers: in childhood, as vital household support later in life, or for those with special care needs.
Others will have been able to support their families or made additional income through wages from domestic work.
Domestic workers do so much for us. They keep us safe, in comfort, well fedas well as enable work outside of our homes.
When we consider domestic work in our own experience, it is often in such a positive light. The emotional bonds that are forged by sharing a home, and the feeling that domestic workers are 'part of the family' are aspects of this job that make it 'work like no other'.
However, in 2011, the adoption of ILO's Domestic Workers Convention finally recognised domestic work is also 'work like any other'.
Known as Convention 189, it was the first international instrument to establish that domestic workers deserve protection, just like all other workers.
The Convention gave fresh momentum to domestic workers and their allies who had been fighting for years to ensure that domestic workers were entitled to basic labour rights, such as access to minimum wages, safe working conditions and protection from discrimination.
This international recognition remains especially critical, because we know that 10 years on, many domestic workers still remain underpaid, overworked, harassed and exploited.
This year, the ILO has looked at just how far we have come over the last decade in achieving the goals of the Domestic Workers Convention.
Our findings show that exclusion from national labour laws and high levels of informality continue to take a heavy toll on the working conditions of domestic workers in the Asia and the Pacific region.
A new report entitled Making Decent Work a Reality for Domestic Workers: Progress and Prospects in Asia and the Pacific Ten Years after the Adoption of the Domestic Workers Convention, 2011 highlights that the majority (61.5 per cent) of domestic workers in Asia and the Pacific are fully excluded from coverage under national labour laws.
Available data indicates that the vast majority of domestic workers in the region do not have any legal limits on their working time (71 per cent), nor any legal entitlement to weekly rest (64 per cent) under current labour laws. The report also finds that domestic workers typically earn some of the lowest wages in the labour market. In addition, COVID-19 is also estimated to have had an outsized impact on domestic workers in Asia and the Pacific, with many job losses.
Despite some progress – notably The Philippines has ratified the Convention and several other countries in the region have improved legal protection for domestic workers – we still have a long road to travel until we realise decent work for domestic workers in the Asia Pacific. There are myriad reasons why we must use this anniversary to reinvigorate our commitment to improving conditions in domestic work.
In the global push towards women's empowerment, domestic work plays a crucial role.
The vast majority of domestic workers are women, and the sector offers employment opportunities to those who may have few qualifications and to migrant women who may be unable to gain access to the labour markets at home and risk so much to take up these opportunities.
More broadly, it is not hard to see how the varying intersections of gender and social norms have influenced the status of domestic work and domestic workers in society.
Work in the home has traditionally been unpaid, and not considered an economically valuable job.
Because the home has not generally been considered a 'workplace', many countries still do not include domestic work as formal employment, meaning domestic work is not yet recognised as work within labour legislation.
The informality of domestic work contributes to its invisibility, and this, in turn, creates a circumstance where the plight of domestic workers is more easily overlooked.
When domestic work remains informal, workplaces aren't registered, working conditions aren't monitored, and domestic workers' access to social security, income protection, and even the COVID-19 vaccine,is limited.
Until domestic work is truly recognised for what it is – work – it will be difficult to fully capture domestic workers' contributions to our broader socio-economic well-being.
We, therefore, urge governments to ratify the Domestic Work Convention and take the catalytic first step of recognising the services performed by domestic workers.
At the ILO, we advocate for this not only because it is the right thing to do, but also because the opportunities for advancement and the scope for changes to the sector having a transformative effect on domestic workers' lives are immense.
Domestic work needs to be considered as an even more essential source of employment in post-COV- ID-19 economic recovery, as a job-intensive sector that meets growing household needs for care services and provides employment opportunities for women who have been hardest hit by the pandemic.
When domestic workers are able to claim their rights and domestic work is appropriately valued, we will see the benefits of a more equitable and just society.
Only then, will we be able to claim that we have 'built back better'.
Asada-Miyakawais ILO's Assistant Director-General and Regional Director for Asia and the Pacific
A version of this article appears in the print on June 21, 2021, of The Himalayan Times.
