The fire smouldering in Burmese hearts
Eleven hundred years and counting. That’s the cumulative time in prison sentences given last month to a handful of people expressing political dissent in Burma (Myanmar).
The news gives me particular pain. In August 2007, the Burmese regime eliminated fuel subsidies, causing the price to rise by 500 per cent. Food costs spiked enormously overnight. A few weeks later, Buddhist monks took to the streets in non-violent protest and many of them were shot or beaten by the junta.
What struck me as much as the horror of their stories was the fact that the Burmese people were willing to tell them. This was in stark contrast to my previous trip in 2004, when no one dared to speak about anything remotely political. Now, emboldened by the world’s gaze, there was the hope that by sharing their stories they might keep that window of attention cracked open a little longer. Much of what I learned, I heard from taxi drivers, flower vendors, waiters, students, housekeepers. Our conversations posed a difficult riddle: Each time I let anyone confide in me, I potentially endangered them.
Yet despite my caution, it seems I was sought out everywhere I went — people felt the need to express themselves at last. I pressed them before we began, “Are you sure you want to speak?” Aung Soe, a slender man in his mid-20s, said, “If we don’t talk to you maybe we are cowards. I was downtown where the monks were shot just outside our Sule Pagoda. I was marching, too. In some ways it was the best day of my life. From now on I speak the fire in
my heart!” By the time I returned home in November 2007, Burma had faded fast from the news.
Then, tragically, cyclone Nargis hit this past May and again the troubled nation held the world’s attention. It is my belief that the Burmese with “fire” in their hearts will continue to speak out and plan further protests despite the terrible price it is exacting. Yet the success of their sacrifices seems tragically compromised as long as there are countries that support the junta’s oppressive regime by selling it weapons.
That’s why these three actions must be taken: First, the US Senate must immediately confirm Michael Green to fill the newly created position of Special Envoy to Burma. Having a regional specialist installed in a dedicated post will bring focus to what has been a largely uncoordinated effort by advocacy, human rights, and UN groups.
Second, the US delegation to the UN Security Council must pressure China, India, and Russia to uphold the arms embargo against Burma that is already observed by the European Union and the US.
Third, we will all need to press President-elect Obama and his future administration to honour the platform that he ran on, which included strong support for human rights. Just a month ago at the UN, 147 states voted to move forward on the creation of an Arms Trade Treaty (ATT).
Only the US and Zimbabwe voted against it. The US must not only reverse its vote but also work to ensure that the ATT includes language curbing arms sales to countries that commit egregious human rights violations against their own people. This would be a giant step forward in honouring Obama’s commitment and would reassert America’s role as a leader in
the promotion of human rights. — The Christian Science Monitor