I can understand the shock the July bombings caused in Britain. I have lived in London, and we want to show solidarity in the fight against terror. But in Brazil we were also shocked that an innocent Brazilian could be mistaken for a terrorist and shot dead by the police. This was a tragic mistake.

Even when you are dealing with someone accused of a crime, that person has a right to defend his or her case before the law. Jean de Menezes was not even accused of anything — he was simply the wrong man. I hope the results of the independent commission will explain to us what happened. Perhaps it is the police’s method that should be questioned. We owe it to the cause of human rights to ensure that we do not attack the innocent, otherwise we will be helping the terrorists, who want to create a climate of insecurity. Now peaceful citizens are not only afraid of suicide bombs, but also of the police.

The British foreign secretary, Jack Straw, said that since terrorism is becoming international, the norms also have to be international. I understand the rules of engagement in the Menezes case have never been discussed anywhere else. I am not saying it is not the sovereign right of the UK to establish its rules of engagement. But for authentic cooperation, we will have to discuss them. I hope we will continue to have a dialogue, and that the Menezes family will be adequately assisted. There is the question of the financial reparations the British government owes the family, and the question of moral reparations also concerns the Brazilian nation. These reparations will only be final when this action is condemned.

We have to work to address terrorism without endangering human rights. Brazil’s own situation is far from perfect, and many police officers have been jailed in Rio recently. The government is trying to have an open and transparent policy on human rights. It is in this wider context of human rights that we are demanding a voice on the United Nations Security Council for those who don’t see every single problem in terms of security alone. A reinforced UN body for human rights needs to address human rights in the wider world. It should not only be developing nations that are on trial.

At present there are cases that are discussed because they are in the interest of some powers, while others are ignored because it is not in their interests. It is a question of everyone having the same standards. Brazil has many problems, but we have invited human rights reporters to investigate and recommend changes. I believe our human rights record is improving. We hope all countries can do the same.

We are realistic, we know the UN cannot be reformed overnight. But we are trying to create a balance between developing and developed countries. It will not be the ideal balance, because the Security Council’s permanent five members will continue to have the power of veto. A complete overhaul of the UN would require another world war. Thankfully that won’t happen, so we must improve it gradually. — The Guardian